Council of
Europe Conseil de l'Europe
European
Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment
APPENDIX
Strasbourg,
22 March 1999
Dear Mr. Unler,
Subject: Visit to Turkey by the
European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 27 February to 3 March 1999.
1. In July 1999, the CPT will transmit
to the Turkish authorities a report on the above- mentioned visit (cf. Article
10, paragraph 1, of the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment). However, the delegation which
carried out the visit wishes to make the following observations at this stage.
2. At the outset, the delegation would
like to thank the Turkish authorities for the excellent cooperation shown by
them during the visit and, more particularly, for the arrangements made to
facilitate the delegation's access to the prison on the island of Imrali.
3. The delegation visited a number of
police establishments in Istanbul as well as the Anti- Terror Department at
Izmir Police Headquarters. Those visits were primarily of a follow-up nature
and allowed the delegation to review developments as regards the treatment and
physical conditions of detention of persons deprived of their liberty by the
police. The facts found by the delegation will be set out in full in the visit
report. However, the information gathered in the course of its visit to the
Anti-Terror Department at Istanbul Police Headquarters must be drawn to the
attention of the Turkish authorities without delay.
Mr. Husrev UNLER Acting Director
Department for the Council of Europe and Human Rights Ministry of Foreign
Affairs DR- ANKARA Turkey
Numerous allegations were received
from persons detained by that Department at the time of the visit of various
forms of torture and ill- treatment, and certain of the persons concerned were
found on examination by medical members of the delegation to display marks or
conditions which were consistent with their allegations. On more than one
occasion in the past the CPT has drawn the Turkish authorities' attention to
the intolerable methods employed in the Anti-Terror Department at Istanbul
Police Headquarters (cf. for example, paragraph 22 of the report on the
September 1996 visit - CPT (96) 69). Decisive action must be taken as of now to
stamp out, once and for all, resort to such methods by police officers
belonging to that Department.
4. During its visit to the prison on
the island of Imrali on 2 March 1999, the delegation examined the treatment of
Abdullah OCALAN, currently the establishmen's sole inmate. In the light of the
information gathered - and, in particular, Mr. Ocalan's statements about his
treatment to date, the medical reports drawn up in respect of him as from the
time of his arrival on the island, the ongoing medical supervision of his
situation, and the fact that his custody is now the responsibility of prison
officers -- the delegation was satisfied that, at present, Mr. Ocalan is not at
risk of physical ill treatment. Further, from its interviews with Mr. Ocalan
and the three doctors attending him ( a general practitioner, a cardiologist,
and a specialist in internal medicine), and after consulting his medical file,
the delegation was satisfied that his somatic health is good.
However, at the time of the
delegation's visit, Mr. Ocalan's psychological state was not good. The
delegation made it clear to the prison authorities on the island that if left
unattended, his state of mind cold lead to unfortunate consequences. According
to information subsequently forwarded by the Turkish authorities. Mr. Ocalan
has since been seen regularly by a psychiatrist; the delegation welcomes this
development. Nevertheless, additional measures are required to counter the
potentially negative effects on Mr. Ocalan's mental health of being held on his own in a remote location
under a high security regime. Those measures relate inter alia [to his possibilities ....with the
outside world] (cf. Paragraph 5) and the precise nature of the regime applied
to him (cf paragraphs 7 and 8).
5. Ensuring that Mr. Ocalan has access
to a radio, newspapers, and books is one requirement which should be met. The
delegation was informed that, according to the relevant regulations, he did
have a right of access to such items, however, given the particular
circumstances of Mr. Ocalan's
detention rendering that right effective may well require the Turkish
authorities to provide him with a radio, newspapers and books. The delegation
would like to be informed whether Mr. Ocalan does now have such items in his
possession. Similarly, positive action on the part of the Turkish authorities
may be necessary to ensure that relatives of Mr. Ocalan who wish to visit him
are able to do so in safety and without excessive delay. Of course, it is also
of crucial importance, from a number of standpoints, that Mr. Ocalan be
guaranteed adequate access to a lawyer. However, the CPT does not intend to
pursue this matter, given that the European Court of Human Rights has adopted
interim measures on the subject.
6. Material conditions of detention in
Mr. Ocalan's cell were of a high standard. The cell was of a good size (13 m2),
well lit (including adequate access to natural light), and suitably equipped
(bed, bedside table, chair, shower, toilet and washbasin, heater air
conditioning system -- all of very good quality). The delegation was informed
that a waist- level screen would shortly be fitted around the shower and toilet
and the cell's furniture supplemented by a desk, further, the cell window was
to be adjusted so that it could be opened to some degree, thereby providing
access to fresh air. The delegation would like to receive confirmation that
these improvements have now been made.
7. At the time of the visit, the regime
applicable to Mr. Ocalan was in the process of being introduced, following his
remand in custody. The delegation was informed that he would be offered two
hours of outdoor exercise per day (one hour in the morning, one hour in the
afternoon), in a yard situated alongside the unit accommodating him; the first
such exercise period occurred on the day of the visit. Mr. Ocalan was to remain
in his cell at all other time, save for when he went to the nearby infirmary
for a medical interview or to the room adjoining his cell to receive visits
from a lawyer or relative.
8. The basic criteria used by the CPT
when assessing the regime in a high security unit are summarized in the
Appendix to this letter. The delegation trusts that the Turkish authorities
will take these criteria into account in the course of developing the regime to
be applied to Mr. Ocalan.
In this connection, the delegation
considers that, in the interests of safeguarding Mr. Ocalan's mental health,
the regime described in paragraph 7 should be rendered less restrictive. In
particular, during part of the day, Mr. Ocalan should be allowed to circulate
freely between his cell and the room adjoining it, and he should be offered
more frequent access to the unit's outdoor exercise facility. Neither of those
measures would jeopardize security.
Further, in addition to ensuring
access to a radio, newspapers and books, positive efforts should be made to
provide Mr. Ocalan with other purposeful activities (hobbies, etc.). Similarly,
with a view to ensuring that Mr. Ocalan benefits from appropriate human
contact, certain suitably-skilled staff members could be designated to converse
with him on a regular basis.
9. The delegation would add that the
outdoor exercise facility currently used by Mr. Ocalan -- a 45 yard surrounded
by a 4 m high wall and topped with a grill -- is of a rather claustrophobic
design, and that its limited size and sandy surface do not facilitate real
physical exertion.
The possibility of allowing Mr.
Ocalan access to a less confined outdoor exercise facility was raised by the
delegation at the time of the visit. However, the prison authorities on the
island expressed strong opposition to such a measure. Whilst appreciating their
concerns on this matter, the delegation remains of the view that it should be
possible from time to time for Mr. Ocalan to be allowed access to a larger
outdoor area. As far as the delegation could ascertain, all the necessary means
exist on and around the island of Imrali to ensure that the measure proposed
does not compromise security.
10. The delegation would be most grateful to
receive the Turkish authorities'
remarks on the observation set out in paragraph 2 and 9. Those remarks would,
of course, be fully taken into account when the CPT's visit report is drawn up.
Yours sincerely,
Ingrid LYCKE ELLINGSEN First
vice-president